Token & Securities Analysis
Howey exposure, token design review, and the line between utility and investment contract.
For Web3 & Digital Assets
Token questions, securities exposure, NFT rights, and entity structure for teams building on-chain.
The legal architecture behind products that touch digital assets.
Howey exposure, token design review, and the line between utility and investment contract.
The corporate wrapper for a protocol, a DAO, or a token-adjacent product.
What buyers actually get — license terms, IP ownership, and royalty mechanics.
Platform terms, risk disclosures, and marketing review for on-chain products.
Where custody, exchange, and transfer functions trigger licensing regimes.
SAFEs, token warrants, and side letters for rounds with a token in the story.
Web3 teams build inside a regulatory map that is still being drawn — securities law written in 1946 applied to token launches, money-transmission regimes designed for wire services applied to smart contracts, and IP doctrine stretched over assets that live on-chain. The projects that survive treat legal structure as part of the protocol design, not as paperwork bolted on before launch.
Token classification turns on economic reality: how the token was designed, distributed, and — critically — marketed. Discord announcements, yield language, and roadmap promises weigh as heavily as tokenomics documents. The practical discipline is doing the securities analysis before distribution and running marketing through the same lens afterward, because the enforcement record is full of projects undone by their own announcement threads.
A treasury, active operations, and no legal entity is the pattern to avoid: courts have shown willingness to treat unwrapped DAOs as general partnerships, with member liability to match. Wrapper options — Wyoming DAO LLCs, foundations, unincorporated nonprofit associations — have matured enough that going unwrapped is a choice, and rarely the right one once real value is at stake.
The token conveys the token; everything else is the license. What buyers can do with the art, what the creator keeps, how royalties work and whether they survive marketplace changes, and what transfers on resale — all of it is drafting. Projects that skip this inherit both community conflict and consumer-protection risk, usually at the worst possible moment.
Money-transmission exposure follows the flow of funds: custody of user assets, exchange functions, and transfers on behalf of others each raise the licensing question under FinCEN guidance and state regimes. Non-custodial architecture is frequently the difference between a question and an obligation — which makes this a product-design conversation, not a compliance afterthought.
Token warrants, side letters, lockups, and a defensible history of past distributions — investor diligence on web3 deals starts with the token story and works backward. Teams that papered their token history under real exemptions, aligned team lockups across equity and tokens, and can explain how the two instruments relate close faster and at better terms.
The fundraising, compliance, and IP guides behind an on-chain build.
Which instrument fits your raise — and how token warrants complicate both.
ResourceWhat investors check in diligence — token history included.
GuideProtect the protocol and product names you are building recognition around.
ResourceFor AI features in web3 products — the overlapping regulatory map.
GuidePrivacy, securities, and data security — the full compliance tree.
Where Promise Legal’s perspective on technology, law, and practice has been published.
Promise Legal profiled as a model small firm with an innovative compensation and pay-transparency structure.
ABA Journal · 2024
Read more“If you're not making mistakes, you're not trying hard enough. Ask why not — oftentimes the doubts are based on indigestion more than actual problem.”
Authority Magazine · Sept 2021
Read more“The lawyer of the future will be part technologist, part legal strategist. Technology permits amazing paradigm shifts in the practice of law.”
Innovations of the World
Read moreThe attorneys who work with web3 and digital asset builders.
Managing Partner
TechAI & Law specialist. Philosophy and computer science background combined with law degree. Founded Journal of Law & Technology at UT Austin.
Attorney
IP LitigationIP litigation and brand protection specialist. International IP experience including trade secret strategy. Trademark portfolio management.
Contract Attorney
CybersecurityNational security and cybersecurity background with 13+ years at NSA. LL.M. in Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Law. Technology law and incident response.
Attorney
Tech & Digital RightsTechnology and digital rights attorney with a computer science background. Experienced in AI, privacy, surveillance, and emerging tech issues.
Promise Legal delivers legal work up to 80% faster by combining seasoned attorney judgment with engineering-grade infrastructure: our proprietary Recursive™ methodology, an AI-powered research wiki, and automated workflows. We've spent six years building these tools — so clients get the speed of modern technology with the judgment of experienced counsel.
Legal work for clients backed by top accelerators and organizations
Recognized nationally for legal innovation, technology leadership, and community impact
Promise Legal's tech-centric model is redefining modern legal practice.
Plain-English analysis on the legal questions web3 actually face — from our attorneys at Promise Legal Insights.
Read articles for Web3If the booking form below doesn't load, schedule directly at book.promise.legal.
Book a consultation to talk through a token question, an NFT license, a DAO wrapper, or a raise with a token in the story.